data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6b18/f6b1865884f5692007c5b991ef3a5d2accafa4cf" alt=""
The song states, as everyone knows, "You're so vain, you probably think this song is about you," which it is! So if the song is about him, then he's not so vain after all.
"Now just a minute!" you might argue. "There are several people this song could be about. Therefore, they are vain because they think a song not about them is about them. That's the point!"
In this case, yes, there are some vain characters hanging around the periphery, but one of those people is correct. The song is about him.
Simon has indicated that it's a composite of three men, but in recent years she has been dropping letters that appear in the man's name. Unless she is being particularly coy and is eventually planning on spelling out the names of all three men, we can only assume that there is one main male acting as the subject of the song. And this man is not vain. He is correct.
In my mind, you can't right a song about someone and call him vain for thinking the song is about him. That's some sort of crazy cognitive dissonance. And just plain stupid.
No comments:
Post a Comment